LabanPH

The State of Philippine Consumer Complaints

An original, cite-to-public-record dataset compiled by LabanPH: what the Philippine record actually shows about consumer-finance enforcement, and what borrowers, OFWs, and pawners are charged. As of July 7, 2026. Every figure below is computed from a named source dataset β€” nothing here is estimated or invented.

1. The regulator-action landscape

Source: LabanPH public-record register (src/lib/publicRecord.ts) β€” court decisions, regulator orders, documented incidents, and primary-source statutes/circulars. Each row links to its source page.

50
Public-record entries
14
Enforcement + court rulings
12
Outcomes adverse to a company
10
Distinct issuing bodies

By issuing body

SEC Philippines12
National Privacy Commission10
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas9
Supreme Court of the Philippines8
News Media6
Food and Drug Administration1
Bureau of Internal Revenue1
FSA Japan1
OJK Indonesia1
National Bank of Cambodia1

By record type

Primary-Source Document32
Regulatory Action10
Court Decision4
Documented Incident4

By outcome (from the company's point of view)

Neutral / informational34
Adverse to company12
Favorable to company2
Pending / open2

Documented enforcement actions & court rulings

DateActionOutcome
2026-04-01SEC advisory warns public against unregistered 'Atome Loan' app operated by Backoffice Associates PhilippinesNeutral / informational
2026-02-14SEC advisory warns public against fraudulent Facebook page impersonating Tala Financing PhilippinesNeutral / informational
2025-08-15SEC issues cease-and-desist orders against seven unregistered online lending platformsAdverse to company
2025-05-09SEC revokes Digido Finance certificate of authority and primary registrationAdverse to company
2025-01-01FDA Advisory 2025-0017 β€” unregistered M Lhuillier-branded food productFDA Advisory 2025-0017Adverse to company
2024-05-16NPC Resolution NPC-BN-19-002 β€” In re PJ Lhuillier IncorporatedNPC-BN-19-002Adverse to company
2023-09-26NPC Decision NPC SS-21-008 β€” In re Populus Lending Corporation (Pesopop)NPC SS-21-008Adverse to company
2023-01-11Supreme Court rules 36% per annum interest unconscionable in Manila Credit Corp. v. ViroomalG.R. No. 258526Adverse to company
2022-06-16NPC Decision SS-21-005 β€” In re Oriente Express Techsystem Corporation (Cashalo)NPC SS-21-005Adverse to company
2022-03-02BIR padlocks 10 unregistered Global Mobility Service branchesAdverse to company
2021-03-16NPC orders immediate takedown of JuanHand and three other online lending appsAdverse to company
2006-05-03Supreme Court companion ruling on pawnshop tax classificationG.R. No. 166786Favorable to company
2003-07-15Supreme Court rules in M Lhuillier's favor in pawnshop tax caseG.R. No. 150947Favorable to company
1998-01-28Supreme Court affirms illegal dismissal finding against predecessor pawnshopG.R. No. 105892Adverse to company

2. What borrowers, OFWs & pawners are charged

Source: LabanPH rate-comparator datasets (lenders, GPS providers, remittance providers, pawnshops, domestic padala schedules). Figures are aggregated ranges across every provider on file.

Loans

12
Lenders profiled
7.5–72%
APR spread (min–max)
1
With GPS kill-switch
8%
Kill-switch prevalence

GPS / vehicle-tracking devices

8
Providers profiled
3
With remote-kill capability
1
Lender-controlled (not customer)
7
Customer-owned device

Remittance (cost on a $200 send)

10
Providers profiled
0–2.5%
FX margin spread
0%
Cheapest (Sendwave)
5%
Dearest (MLhuillier Kwarta Padala)

Total cost = flat fee amortised over a $200 transfer + FX margin.

Pawnshops

6
Chains profiled
2.5–3.5%
Monthly interest spread
60–70%
Appraisal (% of value)

Domestic padala send fee (on β‚±5,000)

β‚±130
M Lhuillier
β‚±145
Cebuana Lhuillier
β‚±0
GCash wallet-to-wallet
β‚±350
Top fee (at β‚±50,000)

M Lhuillier schedule verified January 6, 2026; Cebuana (Metro Manila column) verified January 7, 2026. Compare the full tables at /rates/remittance.

3. The complaint taxonomy

Source: LabanPH issue taxonomy (src/lib/issues.ts) and company register (src/lib/companies.ts).

16
Distinct issue types tracked
27
Companies profiled
20
SEC-registered
13
BSP-supervised

4. Complaints filed with LabanPH

Live aggregate from the LabanPH complaint intake, as of July 7, 2026.

1
Complaints on file
β‚±76,802
Damages claimed (user-stated)
0
Coordinated filings
Volume caveat. These counts are early and growing. They reflect submissions to LabanPH only, are user-stated and unverified, and are not a census of Philippine consumer complaints. Treat them as a lower bound on activity, not a measure of prevalence.

Methodology & caveats

  • Compiler. Compiled by LabanPH, an independent Philippine consumer-advocacy platform. No corporate funding.
  • As of. Curated figures as of July 7, 2026; temporal coverage of the public-record register spans 1930–2026. The live complaint block carries its own fetch timestamp.
  • Cite-to-public-record. Every regulator-action and court figure traces to a primary source (court decision, regulator order, official gazette, or β‰₯2 independent news outlets) via its /record/{slug} page.
  • Rate figures are aggregated ranges across the providers LabanPH tracks β€” not a market census. Verify current rates with providers before acting.
  • Complaint volume is early. Any complaint count is a growing lower bound from LabanPH submissions only, user-stated and unverified.
  • Source datasets: src/lib/publicRecord.ts, src/lib/lenders.ts, src/lib/gps-providers.ts, src/lib/remittance-providers.ts, src/lib/pawnshops.ts, src/lib/padala-rates.ts, src/lib/issues.ts, src/lib/companies.ts.

Reuse the figures β€” the full dataset is downloadable as structured JSON (CC BY 4.0). Attribution: β€œLabanPH, State of Philippine Consumer Complaints.”

πŸ’¬