LabanPH

DigidoExcessive / Undisclosed APR (Online Lending)

Effective annual percentage rate — including processing fees, insurance, and other charges — far exceeds what was advertised or the BSP Circular 1133 cap.

Digido APR complaints follow the documented pattern across SEC-registered short-tenor online lenders: an advertised rate that bears little resemblance to the effective APR once processing fees and ancillary charges are included. RA 3765 and BSP Circular 1133 provide the disclosure framework; SEC EIPD is the live enforcement forum.

This page documents Digido's public record, the documented complaint cohort, and the SEC filing path for an APR complaint backed by the loan agreement and the actual repayment ledger.

Legal basis (Philippines)

See the issue page for the full citation list. Primary statutes implicated by excessive / undisclosed apr (online lending) include RA 11765 (FCPA, 2022), RA 3765 (Truth in Lending Act), RA 10173 (Data Privacy Act), BSP Circular 1048 / 1133 / 1160, and SEC MC 18 (2019) where applicable.

Public record — Digido × Excessive / Undisclosed APR (Online Lending)

No documented public-record events for Digido on excessive / undisclosed apr (online lending) yet — be the first to file.

(1 other public-record entries exist for Digido on unrelated issues — see the company record page.)

File the first complaint →

Documented complaints

No complaints documented yet for Digido on this issue.

File the first complaint →

Recommended actions

  1. 1.Calculate the true effective APR
  2. 2.Generate the BSP/SEC complaint letter (RA 3765)
  3. 3.Compare regulated-bank loan alternatives
  4. 4.Read the BSP Circular 1133 escalation guide

Related questions

Related guides — Excessive / Undisclosed APR (Online Lending)

Did this happen to you?

File a complaint and we will pre-fill your BSP, SEC, DTI, and small-claims letters.

Frequently asked — Digido × Excessive / Undisclosed APR (Online Lending)

What is the maximum legal interest rate for online loans in the Philippines?

BSP Circular 1133 (2021), extended by Circular 1165 (2023), caps consumer-loan effective interest at 6% per month nominal (24% per annum) and total cost at 15% per month for short-term, low-value loans. Courts may strike rates beyond this as unconscionable under Civil Code Art. 1306 (Medel v. CA).

Are online lending apps required to disclose APR?

Yes. RA 3765 (Truth in Lending Act) requires written disclosure of the effective APR before loan signing; SEC MC 3 (2022) further requires online lending platforms to display the effective interest rate prominently in the app.

How do I prove the APR exceeded the cap?

Compute (interest + processing fees + insurance + service charges) ÷ principal × 12. Save the loan disclosure (required under RA 3765) and the in-app fee breakdown screenshots; file with SEC EIPD if the lender is SEC-registered.

Pwede bang ibalik ang sobrang singil ng online lender?

Oo. Sa ilalim ng RA 11765 §4(g) at BSP Circular 1160, ang anumang sobrang singil sa disclosed na rate ay dapat irefund sa loob ng 15 business days. Ang BSP Circular 1133 cap ang ginagawang basehan ng 'sobrang singil'.

Can I sue for predatory interest?

Yes. Civil Code Art. 1306 lets courts strike unconscionable rates; Medel v. CA (1998) and subsequent cases have voided 5%–10% per-month rates. Small claims (≤ ₱1,000,000) is available without a lawyer per A.M. No. 08-8-7-SC.

💬