Does constant monitoring of my phone and location count as abuse?
Last updated: 2026-08-10 · Educational content; not legal advice.
Short answer
It can. RA 9262 §3(C) defines psychological violence as any act or omission causing or likely to cause mental or emotional suffering, and its list of examples — intimidation, harassment, stalking, among others — is explicitly "not limited to" those items. The statute doesn't name phone or location monitoring specifically, so whether a given pattern qualifies turns on whether it causes, or is likely to cause, that suffering.
Need a letter for this?
Primary sources
Frequently asked
Why doesn't the law just name phone monitoring directly?
RA 9262 was passed in 2004, before smartphone location-tracking was common, and §3(C)'s list was written as illustrative examples under an open standard — "such as but not limited to" — rather than a fixed list. Newer conduct isn't automatically excluded just because it isn't named.
Does it matter that he does this constantly, not just once?
The named example closest to this pattern is "stalking," and ongoing, repeated conduct is generally what distinguishes stalking from a single incident — though the statute doesn't define "stalking" further.
If it isn't clearly named in the law, is there still somewhere I can bring this up?
Yes — the /protect guide lists who you can bring a situation like this to, including a barangay official, a DSWD social worker, or the police Women and Children's Protection Desk, rather than you having to decide alone whether it qualifies.
Take action
Got a similar problem?
File a complaint and we'll pre-fill BSP, SEC, DTI, and small-claims letters for you.
Whether what's happening even counts as abuse under RA 9262 — psychological violence without a hand ever being raised, economic control, threats, and the reach of the law beyond marriage and beyond your front door.